Participants:
| (ANL) | Billone, Mattas, Sze |
| (Boeing) | Waganer |
| (DOE) | - |
| (FPA) | Dean |
| (GA) | Petzoldt, Schultz |
| (GT) | Abdel-Khalik, Yoda |
| (INEEL) | Cadwallader, Petti |
| (LANL) | - |
| (LBL) | Yu |
| (LLNL) | Latkowski |
| (MIT) | - |
| (NRL) | Sethian |
| (PPPL) | Brown (Tom) |
| (RPI) | Steiner |
| (SNL) | - |
| (TSI) | - |
| (UCSD) | Mau, Miller, Najmabadi, Tillack |
| (UW) | El-Guebaly |
Farrokh Najmabadi discussed the date for the next ARIES meeting as being associated with a High Average Power Laser Workshop to be held in LLNL. The dates for both meetings have not been coordinated or set, but the dates will likely be in October 2001.
Les Waganer prompted the group to set a date for the next conference call. It was established as 15 August 2001 (Wednesday). Les will arrange for a conference call number.
Abstracts for the upcoming SOFE conference need to be submitted ASAP.
Ron Miller said he and Rene Raffray are defining the overlapping parameter space regions that offer viable design and operating solutions for the HI and laser IFE systems. Ron and Rene have been modeling the driver power requirements with supplied net driver efficiencies (HI is 30% and KrF is 7%) and a fixed recirculating power fraction. The assumed thermal conversion efficiency is 55%. The resultant net electrical power will not be at the desired 1000 MWe, but the results can be scaled upward to the desired output by changing the repetition rate. The target performance is being used at the ìkneeî of the gain curves, above which the performance slowly improves. Ron said most of his data is on the ARIES web and he will add all the contentious data as well for examination..
Rene Raffray completed (and distributed to the team) a set of drywall chamber design parameters, materials, designs, and operating conditions for the DD and ID targets on an Excel spreadsheet. Rene noted he had difficulty to satisfy the SiC/SiC temperature limit of 1000ƒC due to the high heat flux on the chamber wall (~ 2 MW/m2) and corresponding high DT through the wall. As noted earlier, the most likely parameter to change to achieve the desired net power is the repetition rate, but that exacerbates the heat flux problem. The other option is to increase the chamber radius, perhaps from the 4.5 m range up to something around 5.5 m. Rene mentioned a relationship between chamber radius to thermal cycle efficiency (maximum coolant temperature). Les Waganer suggested another option is to use multiple chambers to lower the effective repetition rate and the chamber radius (although this might not be most economic approach).
Ron Petzoldt noted that a larger (5.5 m) chamber radius would require lowering the wall temperature from 1000ƒC to about 950ƒC to avoid excessive target heating.
Laila El-Guebaly relayed information from Don Haynes and Bob Peterson that they are documenting the dry wall chamber physics results and doing calculations for the point design. They hope hoped to send these results to Rene for use by the end of the week (20 July 2001)